Blogrhythm

This blog describes the exciting (rare) and mundane (all to common) aspects of being a performing musician. A bit of programming experiences thrown in on occasion.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

A Lesson In Anatomy For Musicians

OK class. Listen up. For years, nay decades, I have witnessed a bizarre phenomenon at band rehearsals. Well, to be honest, I have witnessed many bizarre phenomenon at band rehearsals but this missive will deal with just one: Amplifier Placement.

Figure 1:

0 0
-\_ _/-
| |
| |
|-\ / \ / \ /-|
|__\ | \ / | /__|
A1 M1 M2 A2
In Figure 1 we see two musicians (M1 and M2) facing each other at a band rehearsal, playing through their amplifiers (A1 and A2) which they have placed behind them. Can anyone see the problem here? No?
OK then. Let me illustrate. In Figure 2 I have drawn a detailed and scientifically accurate representation of the sound-waves emitted from amplifiers A1 ('....') and A2 (',,,,'):

Figure 2:

0,,,,, .....0
-\_ ,,,,, ...... _/-
| ......,,,,,, |
| ... ,,, |
|-\ ../ \. ,/ \,, /-|
|__\ | \ / | /__|
A1 M1 M2 A2
We can follow the path of the sound-waves from A1 ('....') as they move through the air striking the knee of M1 (the musician creating the sound), continuing their path upwards and striking the head of M2 (the other musician). Likewise, the sound-waves from A2 strike the knee of M2 and continue on to strike the head of M1.

Now, this would be fine if musicians were insects, who can have their ears practically anywhere, even on their knees (see http://tinyurl.com/cn5ws). But musicians, at least rock musicians, are nothing but mammals (that's why they do it like they do on the Discovery Channel) and so have their ears located on their heads rather than their knees.

I heard that as a joke some students at MIT or CalTech cross-wired the thermostats from two adjoining rooms. When one room got warm the people turned down their thermostat, which cooled the adjoining room. The people in the adjoining room then turned up the heat, which heated the already warm room, and so on. Ha Ha.

A similar situation is happening at our rehearsal: Musician M2 is hearing more of M1 because M1's amp is sending its sound at M2's head, so M2 turns up his amp. Now M1 is getting blasted by M2's amp so he turns up. And so on. Ha Ha.

Applying a complicated, non-linear finite element acoustic modelling analysis to this problem has provided the solution illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3:

0 0
-\_. ,_/-
| . , |
| . , |
/ \ . /-| |-\ , / | \ /__| |__\ / |
M1 A1 A2 M2
In this configuration the amplifier A1 emitting sound from musician M1 is placed in front and facing M1, and likewise the amplifier A2 emitting sound from musician M2 is placed in front and facing M1. Now each musician is hearing more of themselves and so will be less likely to keep turning up.

In fact, they may even turn down so they can hear the other musician. Ha Ha.

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly...

...seems a good description of last-weekend's wedding reception down in La Jolla (a posh, seaside area of San Diego).


The Good:

  1. Absolutely stunning women, and lots of them.
  2. Our rhythm guitarist played well and in-tune throughout the gig. This was important, because are main guitarist was out, and we were using a fill-in.
  3. Absolutely stunning women, and lots of them.
  4. Great meal! Fillet Mignon and Sea Bass. There were confused crys of "Where's the deli platter with rainbow beef and Miracle Whip(tm)?" But we adjusted.
  5. Absolutely stunning women, and lots of them.
The Bad:
  1. Fighting the La Jolla traffic to make it to the gig.
  2. Strange phenomenon amongst wedding party males stripping off their shirts and periodically jumping on stage, disrupting our drummer's setup.
  3. Our lead guitarist and soundman missing (off being famous playing a concert in Sacramento).
  4. Me (keyboards) having to do the guitar riffs in the Steve Miller medley because our lead guitarist was off being famous (well, he does kick-ass on that guitar, so I suppose he deserves it :-).

The Ugly:

  1. Our leader extending "Unforgettable"--the father/daugher dance--and so deviating from the chart arrangement. The extension was a good idea, because members of the family were coming on the the floor, and this wouldn't normally cause problems, but the chart is a bit complicted so some members got lost and ignored the cardinal rule: When in doubt, drop out.
  2. Our leader throwing "Stacey's Mom" into the middle of "Brown Eyed Girl". Spontanaity is a good thing, in general. However, some members were still realing from "Unforgettable" and had problems with the key shift ("Stacey" == 'E', "Brown" == G) and again ignored aforementioned cardinal rule.

All was right in the end:

However, in spite of some of the rough points, it was a great gig. The people had a great time, and I had a great time. I've been working up a bunch of new material for various projects, and so have been spending more time on my keyboard than I usually do, so my fingers are feeling pretty good. Also, it's great to be a key part of making the reception work, and this one took place on a warm spring evening overlooking the blue Pacific.

And did I mention there were lots of beautiful women?

Sunday, May 08, 2005

Once a Decade: A new keyboard

I seem to buy a keyboard at the rate of one every 10 years. My last purchase--a Roland XP-80--took place in 1996. My motivation at that time was a gig at the Atlanta Olympics. I needed to have a single keyboard small and light enough to check as baggage.

At the time I was playing on a Roland RD-300 and a Roland D-50. The RD-300 in a case is huge and about 100 lbs, a bit over the airlines weight limits. The XP-80 fit the bill nicely; under 50 lbs in a flight case. (Although, when I got to the gig they had backline up the wazoo, so I really didn't need to bring a keyboard in the first place. :-/)

In my 04/29 entry I mentioned that I'm not really comfortable on the XP-80 in a solo situations. I really like the keyboard in general, but as a pianist I miss the weighted action. I checked the reviews over at harmonycentral.com, and the Roland RD-150 seemed to be a good choice for my purposes. I went down to Professional Sound And Music (prosound.com) to try one out, but they are discontinued. I played the RD-300sx (which bears little resemblance to the RD-300 mentioned above, as it's less than 35 lbs) and was quite impressed. It is a basic stage piano, which is perfect for my needs since I have the XP-80 for most band situations. I've been getting used to it here at home and the more I use it the more I like it. Now I just have to get a bunch of solo-trio gigs to take advantage of it.

Sunday, May 01, 2005

Studio session

Studio session was at Exum studios. I mainly redid parts put on by another keyboardist. There was apparently some differences of opinion between the client and the first keyboardist, and things didn't go so well. I put the tracks on and all went well. I like studio gigs. I'd like to do more.

Saturday, April 30, 2005

Friday's gig at the Bistro

Yesterday, Donny called me to do a Duet at Bistro 221. It's an interesting gig because I play solo for about 1/2 the gig. Donny is very nice, but has a rather "rubato" style of singing which keeps me on my toes. I'm not quite sure what kind of feel his usual player uses for many tunes, but I'm pretty sure that it's different from mine.

I also enjoy the challange of reading through the tunes I don't know, and not having a train wreck.

One thing: I don't really feel comfortable playing solo gigs on my XP-80. I would really prefer to have weighted keys. I'm going to start looking into lower-end digital pianos.

Friday, April 29, 2005

Short, fun, programming gig

Short and sweet: A friend who designs websites, but doesn't code needed help with a simple but non-working script to import CSV data into a MySQL database and automate the import.

It's in Perl! Ohhh, my favorite. About an hour and a half and all is working fine, even though the hosting server doesn't allow shell logins and you have to use a time-sinking control panel.

I have to say, the quality of the Perl scripts that folks are apparently actually using on operational websites is nothing less than appalling. No strictures? Simple but wrong regular expressions for parsing CSV?

Sub-gigs: when it rains it pours

Lots of calls for sub-gigs. Sylvia called for a gig in June, Baytown called for gigs in June and July, Donny called for a gig tonight, and I got a call for session work tomorrow.